Determinant Of Savings
This research work on “Determinant Of Savings” is available in PDF/DOC. Click the below button to request or download the complete material
The term savings refers to the part of income immediately spent or consumed but reserved for futureconsumption, investment or unforeseen contingencies. This study examines the determinants of savings in Nigeria between 1985-2011, which will enable us to proffer solution for the improvement of savings in the economy, since it is an important component of the economic development of any country. The method of analysis used in testing the hypothesis are coefficient of multiple determination {R2}, T –test,F-statistics. Data for the study was obtained from the central bank of Nigeria statistical bulletin, the major findings was that per capita disposable income{pdy} has a positive and significant impact on aggregate savings in Nigeria. Based on the findings, some recommendations of policy and suggestions have been made.
1:1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Capital formation is an important factor of an economy growth. For a country like Nigeria to attain economic growth, serious effort should be geared towards capital formation by encouraging savings.
The financial institution markets, regulators and instrument interact within an economy to provide financial services such as foreign exchange transaction, financial intermediation and resources mobilization and allocation.
The financial system in Nigeria can be categorized into two, the formal (organized) and informal (unorganized) financial system. The formal financial system is categorized into capital and money market institutions and these comprises of the banks and non banks financial institution, while the informal sector is made up of the local money lenders (Esusu), the thrifts and savings associations, merchants, shopkeeper or traders, friends and relatives etc. here the system is poorly developed, limited economic information, defective system of accounting and not integrated into the formal financial system. But it is very important and plays a major role in the Nigerian financial system.
Miracle and Cohen (1980) noted that a great bulk of the African population makes little or no use of formal saving and lending institutions, because they offer relatively low returns, savers are reluctant to use formal institutions.
The crucial role played by the financial system in the economic development of an economy was recognized by Gold Smith (1955), Cameron (1967), McKinnon (1973), and Shaw (1973), they demonstrated that the financial sector could be a catalyst of economic growth if it is well developed and healthy. Over the past decades, the declining rends in saving rates in Nigeria have been of great concern to the policy makers and researchers. This is due to the critical importance of savings for the maintenance of strong and sustainable growth in the world economy especially in Nigeria. A sound, developed, healthy and reliable financial system relate to saving mobilization efficient financial intermediaries roles, is first to reduce hoarding and help spread the risk between household and firms.
Secondly, hey create liquidity in the economy by borrowing short term and lending long term loan. Thirdly disseminate information between ultimate lenders and ultimate borrowers there by mobilizing savings from surplus units and channeling them to deficit units through the help of financial techniques, instruments, and institution. Fourth, lower interest rate by bringing about stability in capital market. Fifth, the intermediaries promote development in the financial transaction. Gibson and Isiaka Lobos (1994). The Nigeria financial system
comprises he regulatory/supervisory authorities, bank and non bank financial institution.
As at the end of 2007, the system comprised of the regulatory/supervisory authority. The Central bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nature Insurance Commission (NAICOM), the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC). The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and finally the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN). The CBN is the principal regulator and supervisor in the money market followed by deposit money banks (DMBS), Discount Houses, the people bank of Nigeria and Community Banks. The CBN exclusively regulates the activities of the finance companies and promotes the establishment or specialized or development financial institution.
The security and exchange commission (SEC) is the apex regulatory authority in the capital market. The Nigeria stock exchange (NSE) is a self regulatory or user regulatory institution. The issuing house, registrars and stock brokers, who also interact with the money market, complete the chain the capital the NAICOM is the regulatory authority in the insurance industry while FMBN regulates mortgage finance activities in Nigeria.
Saving refers to the part of income not immediately spent or consumed but reserved for future consumption, investment or unforeseen contingencies, it is considered as an indispensable weapon for economic growth and development. Its
role is reflected in capital formation through increase in capital stock and the impact its makes on the capacity to generate more and higher income.
Savings can also be known as a sacrifice of current consumption that provides for the accumulation of capital, which in turn, provides additional output that can potentially be used for consumption in the future(GERSOVIZ 1988).in other words savings is the different between current earnings and consumption. We can also define savings as he deposit and saving ability acquired by the organized financial institution including bank and non banking financial intermediaries or it is described as a financial accumulated by the public, both government and private agents in the organized financial channels. These financial assets include savings and time deposit in the banking institution provident funds, insurance premium stocks and bonds etc.the intermediation process involves moving funds from surplus sectors of the economy to deficits sector units(Nnann and Englama 2004).To expand financial savings involves shifting of fund from the personal and household sector to the business or corporate sector which in turn leads to greater investment, income growth, employment and capital formation, which cannot be achieved without increasing the rate of savings.
Nigerians savings still falls below the requirement of its financial system due to low per capital income, under investment in productive instruments, and investment in unproductive channels e.g. Glod, jewel, income inequalities and
demonstration effects, etc.to remedy this problem depend on the level of development of the financial sector mentioned above as well as the saving habit of the citizens. The availability of investible funds can be a starting point for all investment. In the economy which will eventually translate to economic growth and development (Uremadu 2006).
The relationship among savings, investment and growth has historically been very close, hence the unsatisfactory growth performance of several developing countries, example Nigeria, has been attributed to poor savings and investment. This poor growth performance has generally led to a dramatic decline in investment. Domestic savings rates have not better, thus worsening the already uncertain balance of payment position, the role of savings in the economic growth of any country cannot be overemphasized (Cheta 1999). Conceptually, savings represent that part of income not spent on current consumption.
Institutions in financial sector like deposit money banks (DMBS) commercial Banks mobilize savings in an economy, the deposit rate must be relatively high and inflation rate stabilized to ensure a high positive real interest rate which motivates investors to save from their disposable income.
In Nigeria Odoko and Englama (2004) are of the view that the level of funds mobilization by financial institution is quite low due to a number of reason, ranging from low savings deposits rates of the poor banking habit or culture of
people. According to them another impediment to funds mobilization is the attitudes of banks to small savers.
Another limitation of saving mobilization is the fact that the concentrations of banks are heir offices are based in favour of urban areas. Among the reasons for this, is the fact that the established banks under rate the volume of savings seeking to be mobilized and channeled into productive investment in the rural areas. It is often argued that since the rural economy operates at a near subsistence level, there is very little that can be squeezed out of income and consumption. Because of this, it has not been realized that the large volume of idle funds, through is small units per individuals exist in the rural areas.
In Nigeria there is basically lack of incentives to savings which had adversely affected savings. Some of these factors include poor banking habits, attitude of banks to small savers, poor orientation, unemployment, instability in the political system etc, corrupt taxation system, instability in banking system etc. one of the problems of mobilizing savings and deposits has always been a major problem for economic growth and development in Nigeria.
According to Friedman (1952) the impact of health on saving has been long recognized in theory, but its effect on the aggregate savings have been considered to be over shadowed by another factor, inflation causes price of tangible assets to rise sharply and changes in net worth based on rising market value giving the
illusion of well being the magnitude of the impact of wealth on saving rate may have the reassured experiences of economic crisis have highlighted the fact low and declining saving rate have contributed to generate unsustainable current account deficits in many countries.
The above arguments underscores the fact that there exist a link between savings and the growth performance of the economy, both in Nigeria and in the world over. This necessitates the need to carry out a detailed study of what actually determines the rate of savings in the contexts of Nigeria economy.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Saving is a macro-economic variable used to attain economic growth and development (Wikipedia encyclopedia, 2009). In Nigeria, there is lasting need to further step-up efforts in mobilizing small savings in both urban and rural areas, given the poor savings culture of the Nigerian people and the theoretical link between saving and investment which underscore the importance of savings on the growth of every economy. When savings are low, interest rate increases and investments becomes low there will be low income and decrease in the Gross National Product (GNP) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the nation which leads to the poor living standard of the people and hinders the depositors from savings.
This research work would attempt to examine the magnitude and nature of such variable as interest rate, inflation, income, urbanization on savings in Nigeria.
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTION
Important research question that arise include what are then the determinant of saving in Nigeria economy? Could it be that there are few dominant determinants of saving due to our poor economy? Could these dominants be consumption rather and interest or many more? Why is the rate of savings in Nigeria very low? Is it as a result of saving in Nigeria very low? Is it as a result of policies requiring further review to make if effective the study intends to answer these questions?
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The broad objectives of the study are to examine the determinant of savings in Nigeria economy. However, the specific objectives are as follows.
1. To determine the impact of savings on the economic growth
2. To determine whether consumption expenditure is a major determinant of savings in Nigeria economy.
3. To determine the magnitude and nature of the elasticity’s of the savings functions in Nigeria.
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The findings and subsequent proposal would be useful to policy makers in policy formations. This study as believed by the researchers would go a long way in contributing to the academic development of the theories of determinant of savings in Nigeria, student of economics and other related fields, would find the study very useful and would serve as a reference point to future researches who might want to research further on the topic.
1.6 STATEMENT OF THE HYPOTHESES
H1: the determinant of savings in Nigeria cannot be ascertained
H2: the magnitude and nature of the elasticities of the savings functions in Nigeria cannot be determined.
H1: the factor that influence savings have no significant determinant in Nigeria.
H2: saving has no significant impact on economic growth.
1.7 SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The scope of this study is to estimate and evaluate the determinants of savings in Nigeria (1980-2008). The research has been contained by lack of fund,
human error and limited time frame which imposed difficulties when serious attempt to effect a general in depth towards the study of the determinants of saving in Nigeria.
Approval Page
Dedication
Acknowledgment
Abstract
Table Of Content
CHAPTER 1
1:1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
1.2 Statement Of The Problem
1.3 Research Question
1.4 Objectives Of The Study
1.5 Significance Of The Study
1.6 Statement Of The Hypotheses
1.7 Scope And Limitation Of The Study
CHAPTER 2
2.1 CONCEPTS OF SAVINGS
2.1.2 The Determinants Of Saving
2.1.3 Mobilization Of Private Savings Other Government Actions
2.1.4 Stylized Evolution Of Savings In Nigeria
2.2 Empirical Review
2.2.1 Factors Influencing Saving In Nigeria
2.3 Limitations Of Previous Studies
CHAPTER 3
3.1 MODEL SPECIFICATIONS
3.2 Method Of Evaluation
3.2.1 Co – Efficient Of Multiple Determinants
3.2.2 T – Statistics
3.23 F – Statistics
3.3 Economic Appiori Criteria
3.4 Data Sources
CHAPTER 4
4.1 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULT
4.1.1 Interpretation Of Result
4.2 Evaluation Of Result
4.2 1. Economic Apriority Criteria
4.2.2. Statistical Criteria {First Order Test}
4.2. 2.1. Coefficient Of Multiple Determination
4.2.2.2. The Student’s T-Test
4.2.3. F-Statistics
4.3 Econometrics Criteria.
4.3.1. Test For Autocorrelation
4.4 Policy Implication
4.6 Evaluation Of Result:
4.6.1 Economic Apriori Criteria
4.6.2 Statistical Criteria {First Order Test}
4.6.2.1. Coefficient Of Multiple Determinants
4.6.2.2 The Student’s T-Test
4.6.3. F-Statistics
4.7 Econometrics Criteria.
4.7.1. Test For Autocorrelation
CHAPTER 5
5.0 SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary Of Findings
5.2 Policy Recommendations
5.3 Conclusion
Bibliography
Journals